Board memory
Successive boards can inspect the original context
A sourced answer helps the incoming board see the emails and documents behind an older decision instead of debating from fragments.
Private Clubs and Recreation Organizations
Dossier is the shared memory for your board and the committees that serve it. Decisions, vendor contracts, capital projects, deadlines. All findable in seconds, with sources attached.
Setup takes minutes. No IT project. No team training.
Capital projects, vendor contracts, membership policies, and facility upgrades all need context that often lives in old email threads.
The current board can see the result but not the reasoning.
Prior terms and promises can be hard to recover.
The recommendation survives after the committee dissolves.
Old debates start over because context is missing.
No app to install. No training for volunteers. No IT project.
BCC board and committee threads worth remembering, or upload supporting documents directly in the dashboard. Vendor contracts, committee reports, capital project documents, membership policy drafts.
Decisions, commitments, deadlines, and context are organized.
Future boards can understand why prior decisions were made.
See it in action
Dossier
The finance committee opened the food service review in August 2025 after member feedback on weekend availability and event flexibility. Pacific Catering submitted an initial renewal at $15,800/month with the existing exclusivity clause intact. After three rounds of negotiation through October and November, the board approved a revised contract in December: Pacific Catering renewed at $14,200/month for 24 months, added Sunday brunch service, extended kitchen hours, and removed the exclusivity clause for member-hosted private events. The committee will revisit performance metrics at the 12-month mark.
Sources
These are the club questions that usually trigger a scramble through old committee mailboxes and board folders.
When a future board asks why something was done, the answer should still lead back to the committee thread, vendor negotiation, or supporting document.
Board memory
A sourced answer helps the incoming board see the emails and documents behind an older decision instead of debating from fragments.
Committee traceability
Finance, grounds, and membership committee discussions remain attached to the decision rather than disappearing after the committee disbands.
Operational confidence
Contract terms, scope changes, and follow-up commitments keep pointing back to the record the board can review.
Once the record exists in one place, the math shifts for your team.
"What changes for our club board?"
Based on the record your team builds, here's what changes:
Capital projects span boards cleanly.
Multi-year decisions stay coherent across rotating boards.
Vendor history outlasts any term.
Prior negotiations, scope changes, and terms stay accessible.
Stop relitigating policy decisions.
Members see the history behind every existing rule.
Committees tied to the board record.
Recommendations stay attached to the discussion that made them.
Defend past decisions at the AGM.
Show the source for any decision being questioned.
Pricing
$99/month per club.
Unlimited users. Unlimited threads.
Less than the cost of one board meeting spent re-debating something that was already decided.
We'll follow up with setup details and next steps.
Dossier is meant to make board turnover less painful without forcing volunteers into a new operating system.
Yes. Committee threads and documents are often where the useful context lives. Sharing them makes later board decisions easier to understand and defend.
Inbox AI is built to help one person move faster through their own mail. It can summarize a single thread, pull a fact from an old email, or draft a reply. Dossier does a different job: it turns the threads and documents your board and committees share into a sourced record of what was decided, by whom, and when. Even the strongest inbox AI does not stitch a board decision together across three separate threads spread over six months, treat decisions and vendor commitments as their own searchable objects, or carry that record forward when the board rotates.
Yes. That is a strong fit. Clubs can recover prior terms, scope changes, and follow-up commitments without relying on whichever director handled the last negotiation.
Dossier still helps from the record you have. It does not require a perfect archive before it becomes useful.
No. It complements them by making the discussions and source material behind those records easier to recover.
Your threads are never used to train AI models. Data is transmitted over an encrypted connection. Only members you invite can see your Dossier, and you can delete your data, export it, or close your account at any time.